EAR99 explained: when an unlisted item still needs a license

Short answer: EAR99 is the label for an item that falls under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) yet matches no Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) on the Commerce Control List (CCL), per 15 CFR 734.3(c). Most EAR99 items ship No License Required (NLR) to most countries. But EAR99 describes the item, not the shipment: a license can still be required because of the destination (Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Russia and Belarus), the end use, or the parties involved.

The usual problem: “EAR99” went into the item master years ago, nobody recorded why, and sales reads it as “ships anywhere”. Below: what the designation means, the items most often mislabeled EAR99, the transactions that need a license anyway, and the Russia and Belarus controls written in HTS codes. Rules in this article were checked against the eCFR text of 15 CFR Parts 732, 734, 740, 744, 746 and 758 on October 15, 2026.

What does EAR99 mean in the regulations?

EAR99 means the item is inside the EAR’s jurisdiction but on no CCL entry. 15 CFR 734.3(c) states that items subject to the EAR that are not listed on the CCL are designated EAR99, and 732.3(b)(3) calls the number a “basket” for items not specified under any CCL entry. In the Order of Review (Supplement No. 4 to Part 774), EAR99 is Step 6: you reach it only after ruling out the USML, the 600 series and 9×515 entries, and every ECCN in the relevant categories. The same Step 6 warns that EAR99 items may still need a license for restricted end users, end uses and destinations. How to run those earlier steps is in how exporters pin down an ECCN.

Is EAR99 the same as NLR or “not subject to the EAR”?

No. Each of these terms answers a different question.

Term	What it describes	Where it comes from
EAR99	The item: subject to the EAR, on no ECCN	15 CFR 734.3(c)
NLR	The shipment: no license is needed for this item, destination and parties. Entered as NLR on the Electronic Export Information (EEI) in the Automated Export System (AES); 15 CFR 758.1(g)(3) also requires the ECCN there for items with a reason for control other than AT, and, regardless of reason for control, for items going to China, Russia or Venezuela	The license determination for each transaction
Not subject to the EAR	Jurisdiction: the item is outside the EAR entirely, for example a U.S. Munitions List (USML) defense article under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)	15 CFR 734.3(b)
A listed ECCN	The item: described by a CCL entry with stated reasons for control	Supplement No. 1 to Part 774

An EAR99 item can be NLR to Canada on Monday and license-required to Russia on Tuesday. The classification did not change; the transaction did.

Which items are often mislabeled EAR99?

The EAR99 label is most often wrong on ordinary-looking electronics and parts that sit in low-profile ECCNs. Three groups come up again and again:

Mass market encryption. A home router or a network storage drive that encrypts data with a symmetric key longer than 56 bits can meet the 5A002 description. If Note 3 to Category 5, Part 2 (the mass market note) applies, 15 CFR 742.15 classifies it 5A992 (the CCL designates such commodities 5A992.c), not EAR99. Only when the encryption falls outside 5A002 altogether, for example under one of its exclusion notes, can the item be EAR99, and the record should say which exclusion.
Commodity electronics in 3A991. 3A991.a covers microprocessor, microcomputer and microcontroller microcircuits with, among other features, a clock frequency rate above 25 MHz. That describes most modern controllers, so boards and modules built around them need a real Category 3 check.
“Specially designed” parts. A machined bracket, cable or housing made for a listed item is caught by paragraph (a)(2) of the definition in 15 CFR 772.1 unless a release in paragraph (b) applies. A part’s simplicity does not release it; only paragraph (b) does.

In each case the real ECCN carries reasons for control and the EEI is wrong. Our guide on how to classify dual-use products covers the specially designed analysis.

When does an EAR99 item still need a license?

An EAR99 item needs a license when the destination, the end use or a party triggers one. As of October 2026 the main triggers are these.

Embargoed and sanctioned destinations

Part 746 reaches EAR99 items for several destinations. North Korea requires a license for any item subject to the EAR except food and medicines classified as EAR99 (746.4(a)). Cuba requires a license for all CCL items and most EAR99 items (746.1(a)(1)). Syria requires a license for all items subject to the EAR except EAR99 food and medicine, but since September 2, 2025 License Exception Syria Peace and Prosperity (SPP) at 15 CFR 740.5 authorizes EAR99 items to Syria, except where a Part 744 end-use or end-user rule requires a license (90 FR 42320). Iran is under a full embargo administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC); under 746.7(a)(2), an OFAC authorization counts as authorization for EAR purposes, and OFAC’s rules apply whether or not the EAR requires a license.

Prohibited end uses and listed parties

Part 744 is written around “an item subject to the EAR”, which includes EAR99. Sections 744.2, 744.3 and 744.4 require a license if you know the item is for certain nuclear, rocket and unmanned aerial vehicle, or chemical and biological weapons end uses. Section 744.11 requires a license, to the extent the Entity List entry specifies, for any item subject to the EAR when a listed entity is a party; 744.8 covers certain persons on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List, and 744.15 the Unverified List. Section 744.22 adds military-intelligence end uses and end users in China, Russia, Venezuela and other named countries. General Prohibition Ten (15 CFR 736.2(b)(10)), which Step 18 in 732.3 applies to all items subject to the EAR including EAR99, bars proceeding with a transaction when you know a violation will occur.

Russia and Belarus: EAR99 controls written in HTS codes

For Russia and Belarus, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) controls many EAR99 items by Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) code, so an ECCN-only item master misses them. Under 15 CFR 746.8(a)(5), a license is required for any item subject to the EAR listed in Supplement No. 4 to Part 746, which identifies items by 6-digit HTS codes. The note to that supplement extends the requirement to 8- and 10-digit codes that begin with a listed 6-digit code, and to parts and components designed for listed items whatever their own HTS code, with fasteners, springs, wire and similar items generally excluded. Paragraph (a)(7) adds the luxury goods in Supplement No. 5. Supplement No. 6 lists further EAR99 items by description and CAS number, such as ethylene dichloride at 95% concentration or more. And (a)(8) covers EAR99 enterprise software: ERP, CRM, CAD, CAM, PLM and similar categories.

Supplement No. 7 is a second HTS-6 list, and it works differently. It applies to Russia and Belarus, Iran and the temporarily occupied Crimea region of Ukraine, states that its items are a subset of items in specific ECCNs or designated EAR99, and feeds the foreign direct product rules in 15 CFR 734.9: it helps decide whether a product made abroad is subject to the EAR at all. Its paragraph (b) ties the listed codes to the license requirement in 746.8(a)(2) for those foreign-produced items. Entries include 848210 (ball bearings) and 854231 (processors and controllers), so bearings a non-U.S. supplier makes with certain U.S. technology or software can come under the EAR for a Russian order.

Worked example (hypothetical): a U.S. distributor holds rubber conveyor belting, reinforced only with textile, that a CCL review found to be EAR99, under HTS subheading 4010.12. A mining contractor orders it for delivery in Russia. Subheading 4010.12 appears as entry 401012 in Supplement No. 4, so 746.8(a)(5) requires a license even though the belting is EAR99. Now the same order comes from a trading company in a third country whose website lists Russian customers and which asks for unmarked cartons. No Part 746 rule names that country, but the facts point to Russia, and General Prohibition Ten and the knowledge standard apply. The HTS code made the first check possible, which is why exporters need both the ECCN and the HTS code on every item.

Holding both numbers on one record is the gap TariffWolf works on: its export control workbench records the reasoning behind each EAR99 result and runs the destination and party checks (OFAC SDN, BIS Entity, Denied and Unverified lists) that can still require a license.

How should you document an EAR99 determination?

Document an EAR99 determination as a short record of what you ruled out. 15 CFR 762.6 requires EAR records to be kept for five years from the latest of the export, any known reexport or transfer, or the end of the transaction. A record that would satisfy a BIS question contains:

the jurisdiction step: why the item is not on the USML;
the CCL categories reviewed and each candidate ECCN, with the parameter that failed;
the encryption check (5A002 or 5A992) for anything with a processor or software;
the “specially designed” analysis for parts and components;
the 10-digit HTS or Schedule B code, for the Part 746 lists;
the datasheet revision, the reviewer and the date.

Review it whenever BIS amends the relevant CCL category, because an EAR99 item can pick up an ECCN.

Do the EU and India have an EAR99 equivalent?

Neither uses the EAR99 label, but both let an unlisted item need a license. Under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2021/821, an exporter of a non-listed item needs an authorization if the authorities inform it that the item may be intended for weapons of mass destruction or certain military end uses, and must notify the authorities if it is aware of such a use itself. India’s SCOMET rules contain a similar catch-all for items not on the SCOMET list.

Frequently asked questions

Does EAR99 need an export license?

Usually not for ordinary commercial shipments, which go NLR. A license is required when the destination (such as North Korea, Cuba or the Russia and Belarus HTS lists), a prohibited end use under Part 744, or a listed party triggers one. The item’s classification is only the first check; each transaction needs its own.

Is EAR99 the same as NLR?

No. EAR99 is a classification of the item; NLR is the conclusion that a particular shipment needs no license. An EAR99 item is often NLR, but the same item can need a license for a different destination or buyer.

Can EAR99 items go to China?

Most EAR99 items can ship to China without a license. A license is still required if a party is on the Entity List to the extent its entry specifies, or if you know of a prohibited end use under Part 744, including the military-intelligence rule in 744.22.

Can EAR99 items go to Russia?

Many cannot, as of October 2026. Section 746.8 requires a license for EAR99 items on the HTS-based list in Supplement No. 4 to Part 746, the luxury goods in Supplement No. 5, the items in Supplement No. 6 and certain enterprise software; Supplement No. 7 extends the rules to some foreign-made items. Check the item’s HTS code against those lists and OFAC’s Russia sanctions before quoting.

Keep the EAR99 reasoning and the HTS code on the same record, and the shipment-by-shipment checks for destination, end use and parties take minutes.

To see that record built for your own catalog, bring a handful of items your team labels EAR99 to a call. TariffWolf’s export control workbench shows the CCL reasoning for each one and the destination and party checks that apply.

See TariffWolf in action — book a 1-hour walkthrough

Pick a time on the calendar that loads next — no email back-and-forth.